Editing The Two Towers

From LOTR-TCG Wiki
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 36: Line 36:
The most impactful new mechanic involves the split [[Ring-bound]] and [[Unbound]] labels for companions, which was an attempt to represent the story split between Frodo in Mordor and everyone else in Rohan.  Ring-bound companions (Ithilien [[Ranger]]s, Frodo, Sam, and later {{Smeagol}}) were part of Frodo's storyline, while unbound companions were off fighting in Rohan.  {{C|Raider}} cards would target and gain bonuses from fighting Ring-bound companions, while {{C|Isengard}} and {{C|Dunland}} cards would target unbound companions.
The most impactful new mechanic involves the split [[Ring-bound]] and [[Unbound]] labels for companions, which was an attempt to represent the story split between Frodo in Mordor and everyone else in Rohan.  Ring-bound companions (Ithilien [[Ranger]]s, Frodo, Sam, and later {{Smeagol}}) were part of Frodo's storyline, while unbound companions were off fighting in Rohan.  {{C|Raider}} cards would target and gain bonuses from fighting Ring-bound companions, while {{C|Isengard}} and {{C|Dunland}} cards would target unbound companions.


This mechanic endured, if only because having a shorthand of "unbound" instead of "(except the Ring-bearer)" was convenient for game design.  However, even with the number of culture-level designs around targeting specific subsets of individuals, you had the issue of a {{C|Rohan}} fellowship dragging Frodo with them as their [[Ring-bearer]], or a Ring-bound Ranger fellowship trekking through Rohan, which remained thematic issues that made TTT more ill-fitted to the game mechanics thematically than FOTR was.
This mechanic endured, if only because having a shorthand of "unbound" instead of "(except the Ring-bearer)" was convenient for game design.  However, even with the number of culture-level designs around targeting specific subsets of individuals, you had the issue of a {{C|Rohan}} fellowship dragging Frodo with them as their [[Ring-bearer]], or a Ring-bound Ranger fellowship trekking through Rohan.
 
Also related to the Ring-bound/unbound split was the treatment of the site path--the [[Towers Block]] site path in general follows the "unbound" plotline, but various "ring-bound" conditions were included that offered flavor relating to Frodo's journey at specific sites.  These cards include:
 
* {{Card|Cliffs of Emyn Muil}}
* {{Card|Eastern Emyn Muil}}
* {{Card|Forests of Ithilien}}
* {{Card|Henneth Annun}}
* {{Card|Ruins of Osgiliath}}
* {{Card|Ithilien Wilderness}}


== New Cultures ==
== New Cultures ==
Line 80: Line 71:
* [[Site Control]] and liberation
* [[Site Control]] and liberation
* [[Culture Token]]s
* [[Culture Token]]s
* Subtitles on possessions, artifacts, and conditions (compare {{Card|Ranger's Sword, Blade of Aragorn}} with {{Card|Ranger's Sword}}
* Subtitles on possessions, artifacts, and conditions (compare {{Card|Glamdring}} with {{Card|Glamdring, Lightning Brand}}
* Allies with multiple home sites, rather than just 1
* [[Mount]]s and the pseudo-keyword "[[Mounted]]"
* [[Mount]]s and the pseudo-keyword "[[Mounted]]"
* A new site path, which completely replaced the [[Fellowship Block]] site path  
* A new site path, which completely replaced the [[Fellowship Block]] site path  
Please note that all contributions to the LOTR-TCG Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. Your writing is liable to be edited mercilessly, so be sure to back up any major claims with links if possible.

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)