Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 21: |
Line 21: |
|
| |
|
| The first player sits down, and the others then sit in clockwise order around the table according to their choices.}} | | The first player sits down, and the others then sit in clockwise order around the table according to their choices.}} |
|
| |
| =Strategic Considerations=
| |
|
| |
| Because bidding is a part of setting up the game, it can strongly influence how you build your deck, and deserves careful planning. It is a powerful advantage to be able to go first, as this allows you to place down your own copy of site 1 (often with key game text for for furthering your Free Peoples' setup. Think: {{Card|The Prancing Pony}}), and because this immediately puts your Free Peoples in the lead in their race towards site 9. The pressure is now on for your opponent to either slow your Free Peoples down, or, more rarely, to use cards which add to the move limit for their turn. Theoretically, if they fail in these endeavors, there is nothing their Free Peoples' side can do to keep up.
| |
|
| |
| Bidding high comes with great risks, however. The number of tokens you choose to bid will become the number of burdens with which your [[Ring-bearer]] begins the game, and there are powerful shadow cards--and entire shadow strategies--which grow in power as the burdens begin to stack up. Furthermore, going first--if that is your choice after winning your bid--allows your opponent to play their sites down on the adventure path, beginning from site 2, and going all the way until their Free Peoples (potentially) outpaces you. This allows for powerful site-based shadow support, as seen with cards like {{Card|Ford of Bruinen}}, {{Card|Hollin}} and {{Card|Dimrill Dale}}. And finally, going first requires your Free Peoples to step out on their first turn with only those resources found in your opening hand, or otherwise fetched out by your Site 1. This may not be a problem at all; there's always a chance that your opening hand will be stellar. But a Free Peoples' strategy which intends to go first should account in some way for the risk of a very poor opening hand--and this largely comes down to the self-sufficiency of the starting Fellowship (and, as appropriate, the companion possibly fetched by site 1).
| |
|
| |
| The risk of starting with too many burdens can be powerfully countered by the use of {{Card|Sam, Son of Hamfast}} in your starting fellowship. However, Sam comes with a twilight cost of 2, which leaves only two further twilight to spend on other companions. Alternatively, in the proper block/format, Sam might be fetched by The {{Card|Green Dragon Inn}} with relative ease, at the cost of otherwise being able to fetch a more stalwart fighter, such as Aragorn.
| |
|
| |
| There are benefits to bidding low, particularly for a deck strategy which is designed around going second. Being able to confidently bid zero burdens leaves your Ring-bearer quite healthy to begin the game, which at the very least gives you time to see what shadow strategy your opponent is playing. If you begin to see that burdens won't be too much of a risk against your opponent's shadow side, then you can more reliably involve your Ring-bearer in skirmishes and archery fire, thereby protecting some of your other key companions, as they in turn protect your Ring-bearer. Going second also gives you a chance to reconcile after your first Shadow phase, and take your first Free Peoples turn with a good probability of a stronger hand than your first 8 cards.
| |
|
| |
| Finally, it is worth noting that the winner of the bid gets to choose where he or she will go in the turn order. So, winning a bid can mean going second, if that is your gameplan.
| |
|
| |
|
| {{:Game Concepts Table}} | | {{:Game Concepts Table}} |
| | | |